Em qui., 19 de jan. de 2023 às 05:04, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at> escreveu:
> afaict the idea is to get rid of this abstraction altogether, and be able > to just use > [clone -di -s 1 dac~ 16] > yeah I guess it was pretty late and I was tired and I couldn't see how this could actually make [dac~] get arguments from the instance number. I was looking at the abstraction and had a hard time adapting to the new concept. > again, i don't see why we couldn't juse use > [clone -x -d lop~ 500] > yup, forgot about the -x flag, so yeah, [clone] would cover both cases easily! Sorry I was thinking clearly and through. I am just rather hesitant in believing [clone] can actually solve all the problems without any modification :) and even now I am still insecure. But anyway, in the case we find something in the way and it needs modification, we could have a modified alternative with another name, that's all, but I guess I may eventually get confident it doesn't need anything new, let me think through and see ;) thanks
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
