Isn't "mux~/demux~" closest to what's actually happening?
Unfortunately, these are also zexy objects ;-)
On 24.01.2023 11:52, Max wrote:
Isn't "mux~/demux~" closest to what's actually happening?
when "joining" two signals, I wouldn't expect them to be running in
parallel but being mixed together.
m.
On 24.01.23 02:50, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote:
So merging (hmm) some ideas from Fede and Dan, maybe "join~/split~", and
a new tap~ object that allows you to pick channels out specifically.
Then
I think for example "clone osc~" might do OK for making an oscillator
bank -
assuming it turns out to be practical to send message-time lists to the
frequency input. (Maybe that's someting clone should know how to do
in other
situations too).
still thinking about, for instance, "clone -" to make clones of an
anonymous
abstraction that you just edit into being live...
cheers
Miller
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
