Just checking out SCALA, it's the standard scales format I see. So, does [tunetof] embed thousands of scales in a table like my thing or do you load them on demand through the py script? Which is better in your opinion? I was happy to see that the 1000 or so from CLM fit happily into < 64k even when packed very clumbsily. The only rough edge so far is that scales are variable length, some are just 4 or 5 notes and others run up over many octaves.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:04:45 +0200 Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo, > padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote: > > > I don't have a musical enough ear to have a clue whether this > > does entirely what it's supposed to. Any ideas? > > Has this been done before? To be proper I think it needs to work > > on the original integer ratio data so it computes at the accuracy > > of the machine running it. > > I did something similar, but much simpler, with [tunetof], which is a > replacement for [mtof] using different intonations. The intonations > are specified as a simple table which maps "notes" to frequencies. > These tables can be generated from tuning files in Scala's file format > using a Python script supplied with [tunetof]. Both are available in > CVS at /abstractions/footils/tunetof/ > > [1] http://www.xs4all.nl/~huygensf/scala/scl_format.html > > Ciao > -- > Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
