On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, s.koepf wrote:
it is No 1464539 in the bug-tracker.
Because of a typo that Orm Finnendahl made in 2002.
BTW, Orm told me once, that it wasn't he who wrote this code.
It's possible. Me, I only looked up the credits in pd/extra/expr~/ .
Do you really think, we should keep this (bug) for backwards compatibility?
No, I think that [expr] should get an optional argument feature, which
would then allow floor() and ceil() to be redefined to be an
either-1-or-2-argument function.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
