On 29/10/2006, at 22.20, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:


On Oct 29, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Steffen wrote:


On 29/10/2006, at 2.34, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

I think that Intel and PowerPC should ultimately be on the same page, since 95% of it is probably the same. The idea is to take the content from /docs/developer/darwin and put it into this wiki page, then redirect it to the wiki page.

Yes, i see your point, i agree.

What i'd like to see in such a page is a table describing what libs (ie. Fink packages) a given external depend on. I mean, that would indeed please the curious reader/user.

Sounds good, perhaps a wiki page for that? Usually, its a question of who does the work to keep it up to date, hopefully being a wiki will help with that.

https://puredata.org/docs/developer/Dependencies

I guess externals overtime can alter there dependencies list, hence making such list/table writable for all would be ideal to keep it update - so yes, i agree.

But could I fx. start do the job? Where/how do i find out what a given external depend on, and what externals there are (in pd- extended)? That is, if i knew, i might have done it already. Can it be pulled out of the ./configure info?

Also such information could be used in the hypothetical situation where a user wouldn't want to do a complete pd-extended build, but rather a subset - that is, with only a subset of the externals included.

Yeah, I think we should have that ability. I think the best way to achieve that is with a autoconf/configure. Then it would automatically find dependencies and build what it can considering.


Yes, good idea. Though the users will still need the above list of dependencies in order to install the dependencies needs to build a given subset of pd-extended. It might be a nice to have feature to be able to supply a list of externals one would want build, in the hypothetical situation where one have the dependencies for a given external but still don't want to build it into the subset of pd- extended.

Its just a matter of someone doing the work.

Yes. I don't think the demand will be huge (might only be me), and the dependencies list will be somehow needed. So it could be left fairly low prioritized on a todo-list somewhere. But in the realm of making a comprenhencive documentation on how to obtain different "configurations" of Pd i think it would be needed.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to