Yeah, I've been looking at it a lot recently. Even if your not into music (and right now really only techno music) net-pd sets a really good standard for pd programming and encapsulation, and probably represents the best of UI practice using only the intrinsic components. I'm thinking next year I will start to move the music synth (toys and gizmos) part of my work towards net-pd because it represents an important versioning commonality to share patches which the wider Pd lacks. There's still room for improving it too. I have some ideas I'm mulling over to do with distributed composition which I hope to add some day and net-pd seems the obvious place to try these out. If you're in London today at the Openlab3 meet we will hopefully get to try out setup based on OSC to perform with simple distributed synthesisers on a LAN.
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:18:02 +0800 Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 10:40:39AM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > i hope you'll have fun with netpd. > > I just wanted to jump in on this thread to say that I find netpd to be > one of the most exciting things I have seen in electronic music ever. > Thanks so much Roman and all the other contributors for making it. You > guys are really pushing new frontiers with this. If anyone hasn't tried > it yet, you should get into it! > > Best, > > Chris. > > ------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mccormick.cx > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
