Hallo, padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote: > Cool! We've discovered something "very wrong".
Maybe not, read on. > Here I get > > number bcalc ecalc bcplx ecplx > -------------------------------------------------------- > 4 70 80 110 290 > 8 140 160 210 560 > 16 260 330 430 1130 > 32 560 660 1070 2300 > 64 1220 1490 3250 4720 Hm, you're right, with such small numbers I actually also get better results for the builtins. I was only testing bigger numbers at first. With a growing number of test objects I get a huge lead for [expr]. Here are some of my statistics (on a much faster machine): num bcplx ecplx ------------------- 128 720 1170 256 2780 2320 512 10430 5800 Now I'm wondering, if something became "very wrong" with [expr] ... Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
