On Dec 12, 2006, at 6:26 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The right inlet serves as the loadbang. You need to use the
right inlet
instead of regular [loadbang]s
Could this be changed so that it uses the ordinary [loadbang] ? If
you
have a canvas to send messages to, you can send it a "loadbang"
message,
which will trigger all the [loadbang]s in the canvas. Is there a
reason
why the canvas can't be reached (or can't be reached
individually), and
could this be circumvented easily?
It is just there for backwards compatibility. I only reworked nqpoly4
to make it look nicer and to make further development easier. The
[polypoly] abstraction that I derived from nqpoly4 doesn't need the
loadbang-inlet anymore, it sends a "loadbang"-message after
dynamically filling the subpatch, which, as you wrote, loadbangs all
objects inside that subpatch just fine.
Since you've now written another, do you think there is a possibility
of making a nqpoly "kernel" for making poly systems with different
functionality, like the auto-[switch~] version, the instance manager
version, etc.
What I do a lot of is making a patch, then controlling many copies of
it, so I plan on making a version of nqpoly4 that works well in that
situation.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and
this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
