Frank Barknecht ha scritto: > Hallo, > Luke Iannini (pd) hat gesagt: // Luke Iannini (pd) wrote: > > >> Abstractions don't loadbang when created via [; pd-mycanvas obj 10 10 myabs( >> > > Send "loadbang" to "pd-mycanvas" to loadbang the subpatch and its > abstractions: > > [obj 10 10 myabs, loadbang( > | > [s pd-mycanvas] > > Ciao > hello, I remember having played with this. but why manually created objects (i.e. with CTRL+1, objname, CTRL+E) do receive their loadbang, while there isn't an equivalent for dynamically patched objects? (yes, you can only loadbang the *parent* of the object you've just created)
I remember a (perhaps dirty) workaround for this was to enclose the new [dynamically created] object in a subpatch, but this solution has a big drawback, that is: you can't do it in an abstraction, because accessing 'pd-subcanvas-name' would not be unique. otherwise one would have used [namecanvas ...], but someone is saying it's deprecated?? ... big inconsistencies? note: I'm not sure if dollarg expansion now works in a place different from beginning, it est: would-$1-get-replaced-with-its-value-and-also-$2-will? my two cents -- Federico _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list