On 15/01/2007, at 11.49, Roman Haefeli wrote:
exactly, and since [wrap~] gives you the difference between the
largest
integer not exceeding X and X, it will always give you 0, when X is an
integer.
That's how i read it too. But following that: If 0 (zero) is an
integer (it normally is, right?), then the largest integer not
exceeding 0 is 0, and the difference is 0-0=0. Problem being that
wrap~ of the signal 0 gives 1, not 0.
I'd like to know too, as i find the description from the help patch
confusing (when the input is integers). As i understand what wrap~
does (again, on the integer domain), it's like a function f: Z ->
{0,1} where f(N)=0 and f(Z\N)=1 (where N is the numbers 1,2,3,.. and
Z is the numbers ...,-1,0,1,...).
the output of [wrap~] is always => 0 and < 1.
Again, i agree that from the description it would make sense if that
intact was the output domain. But it doesn't match the experience
using wrap~.
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
