Luke Iannini writes:
Sorry if I'm losing everyone : ), hopefully at least the idea of a
Pd-Message-Patchmatrix makes sense to everyone and I'm just losing
everyone with my implementation and explanation thereof!

I don't yet understand the details of what you propose, but I certainly see the value of your goal; it's something I've dreamed about, too -- dynamic patching. Best of luck to you, and I will follow your progress with interest.


Phil Stone
UC Davis

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to