On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 11:38 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> 
> > i guess if i can do it in userspace, it is possible in pd itself.
> 
> possible is almost everything with software, but how much effort does
> it need? rewriting pd? 
> though i am not too much a techie myself, i hear voices saying, that
> despite the upcoming multicore-processor, pd won't be able to do
> threading in the near future (which would be necessary in order to
> make
> use of the additional calculating power). from my understanding of
> things, i'd say, that in order to avoid drop-outs on patch-load (or
> file/audiosample-load), pd would require threading (please someone
> correct me, if i am totally mistaken). afaik, pd-dev does already some
> of it (e.g. when reading a soundfile into an array). 

all threaded implementations of the soundfiler/sndfiler have the
problem, that the dsp chain needs to be resorted after loading a file to
a table ... so, an audio dropout will occur, when the dsp chain is
resorted.

tim

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    ICQ: 96771783
http://www.mokabar.tk

I must say I find television very educational. The minute somebody
turns it on, I go to the library and read a good book.
  Groucho Marx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to