Chuckk Hubbard wrote: > On 1/30/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> > >> > Also, you can track the state if you do this: >> > >> > [receive pd] >> > | >> > [route editmode] >> > | >> > [X] >> > >> >> no, you cannot. >> at least: i cannot. >> see http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-01/046344.html >> (hey, that was only yesterday...) > > [receive pd-subpatch] > | > [route editmode] > | > [X] > > works, and was maybe what he meant. My thought was to have a separate > send-receive for notifying other objects of changes, because this > receiving messages intended for subpatches makes me uneasy. You also > don't need the [route] if there's a separate channel just for editmode > tracking.
it seems like i am missing something fundamental here. your patch does not work for me. except if i would be turning editmode on/off via explicit messages to pd-subpatch (but then it is trivial); maybe this is what you mean. i thought about being notified if the subpatch goes to edit-mode, e.g. because the user has done Ctl-E. mg.sdft IOhannes > -Chuckk > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list