> anyway, why do you want to have a litteral \'$0\' in the abstraction > argument and not the value, that it represents, since it is actually the > same? if i am not totally mistaken, this would only make sense, when you > plan to save the patch with all the dynamically generated stuff
OR when the patch that will receive the message is not the same one (or a subpatch of the one) in which you generate the message; that is, if \"$0\" evaluates to different values in the two contexts. This is possible, isn\'t it? This wouldn\'t necessarily involve saving.... However, I think an escaping mecanism (at least for $\'s in messages) would indeed be vital. WHENEVER a special character exists, an escape character should exist, just in case. Bye M. -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Problemi di Liquidità ? Con Logos Finanziaria 30.000 € in 24 ore a dipendenti e lavoratori autonomi con rimborsi fino a 120 mesi clicca qui Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=2907&d=20070208
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list