Like Frank, I haven't had a chance to check you patch..but wasn't there
something about the creation order of these things which makes a
difference? I remember getting *very* frustrated by this once.
d.
padawan12 wrote:
I found this behaviour slightly surprising, but on reflection it makes sense.
Pd doesn't seem to check deeply into subpatches when looking for DSP feedback
loops.
I started making a simple waveguide synth and decided, for a change, to work on
the feedback mechanism inside another subpatch. I kept getting DSP loop error
even though the signal path contains a [s~] and unique matching [r~]. Making
the feedback loop require a [send~] and [receive~] in the outermost block seems
to defeat the use of smaller blocksizes in subpatches.
--
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 96:
"Is the intonation correct?"
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
