Hi Eric,
what exactly is the difference of samm~ compared to the long time
existing iem t3 objects?
t3 uses time tagged triggers, samm~ sends clicks that are not time
tagged.
I see, are there other advantages (cpu-wise maybe)? Since these
periodic clicks could also be generated with t3-based abstractions.
>> particularly
>> with the soundfile player called player~ which I think has some
nice
>> features.
I'll definitely look into that one, although xsample also allows
signal controlled sample processing.
Both groove~ and xsample~ have a lot more features than player~. The
two features I likely about player~ are internal polyphony and
sample-accurate triggering. (Perhaps xsample~ can do that too?)
xsample can do sample-accurate triggering, but has no internal
polyphony.
greetings,
Thomas
--
Thomas Grill
http://grrrr.org
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
