osc~'s right inlet only takes data, if I'm correct. k
On 2/21/07, Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:54:21PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > This means, that resynthesizing this signal at SR=48000 would be > > similar to using oscillators like this: > > > > [osc~ 0] > > | > > [*~ 4.4602] > > > > [osc~ 6000] > > | > > [*~ 1.1871] > > > > [osc~ 12000] > > | > > [*~ 0.62254] > > > > [osc~ 18000] > > | > > [*~ 0.47394] > > > > ... > > > > and so on (Note that without normalizing these values are to loud.) > > > > However: All these oscillators would also need to have their phases > > set accordingly, so you cannot just use above oscillator bank directly > > in real life. > > Can't you use [osc~]'s right inlet to accomplish that? > > Anyway, I've always seen spectral modifiers that work on the amplitude > data only. What happens if you work on the phase data only? I mean, what > does it sound like? I guess I should just try it. > > Best, > > Chris. > > ------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mccormick.cx > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > -- ++++ http://pocketkm.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
