I wanted to say it is sad, that law does never cover all possibilities, and sometimes even protects illegal behavior. marius.
Thomas Grill wrote: > I think this is what is called "selective perception". Nobody said that > it's generally illegal, like nothing is. > all the best, Thomas > > marius schebella schrieb: >> sad, but you're absolutely right. >> marius. >> >> Yves Degoyon wrote: >> >>> ola, >>> >>> >>>> It would be good to find out what the legal status of code >>>> that is illegally licensed. We've had this issue before with the >>>> not-for-military-use clause that Yves added to his software, rendering >>>> it technically illegal. A lawyer could tell us if it's a) in legal >>>> limbo >>>> land where nobody is legally allowed to use it b) defaults to public >>>> domain c) something else weird. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> in fact, i'm glad of considering my software 'illegal' >>> when you see what the 'law' ( mainly american ) >>> and the OMC are able to achieve with tricks. >>> >>> saludos, >>> sevy >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list