i'd really like to check it out, but unfortunately i don't know how to compile it on linux. can you help me?
roman On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 00:02 -0400, Martin Peach wrote: > Did anyone try sqosc~ yet? I'm interested to get feedback on that one. > > http://pure-data.cvs.sourceforge.net/pure-data/externals/mrpeach/sqosc~/ > > Martin > > David Powers wrote: > > Hi Roman, I get the following error from your patch, for many of the tables: > > error: 1002-square33: number of points (512) not a power of 2 plus three > > > > Along with this error, it seems to stop playing somewhere above 360 Hz... > > > > Thanks for your help, I'm sorry to sound grumpy, it's just that in > > searching the archives mostly all I found was my old query for a year > > ago. Plus everyone says to use [blosc~] but I posted in my first post, > > that [blosc~] is broken, and I believe that it's known, ie here is > > says: > > http://blog.soundsorange.net/index.php/archives/2006/09/28/exploring-pd-extended/ > > "exploring pd extended > > 27/9/2006 > > CPU load rating > > blosc~ - intriguing band limited oscillators, but patch is self > > referential and not working" > > > > Again, a reminder that this isn't really for me, but rather, it's the > > list members chance to sell other people on PD being useful, or not, > > to the outside world. [vst~] is working great so I can demonstrate > > subtractive synthesis with VST's within pure data, but that's > > suggesting to people that PD isn't really good for traditional > > synthesis... So if you think PD is good for synthesis, let me know > > about it!!! > > > > ***Note: I personally don't use PD with Gem for VJing, and to make > > weird generative MIDI sequences, mostly... I never really considered > > synthesis a strong point for PD, for reasons that should now be > > obvious. > > > > ~David > > > > On 3/14/07, Roman Haefeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> hello again > >> > >> i improved guenter's bandlimited square a bit. i noticed that it is > >> hardcoded to 48kHz and accidently i was running pd at 48kHz, that's why > >> it sounded quite good here. however, how far i can see it, the part, > >> that selects the appropriate table, is not working as it should. i > >> couldn't completely follow, how it works, but it seems to switch only > >> correct from tab1 to tab2. for other tabs it switches at too high > >> frequencies, which might introduce a bit aliasing. > >> in my version the tables are generated on loadbang, which makes the file > >> much smaller and easier to adapt for other waveforms. the tabselector is > >> now dependent on the sampling rate, so it should sound well at different > >> rates now. in order to provide the full spectrum even in low > >> frequencies, i added a raw square generator. below a certain frequency, > >> the oscillator switches to the raw square version, so that it should > >> sound good at arbitrary low frequencies. the number of tables generated > >> on loadbang can be changed. a bigger value lowers the frequency, at > >> which the oscillator switches to the raw version and vice versa. > >> > >> i hope you'll have fun with it. > >> > >> roman > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 04:46 -0600, David Powers wrote: > >> > >>> I found those, but are they really band-limited? I'm fairly sure I > >>> hear ugly digital artifacts in the saw. The square appears to be > >>> broken, unless I made a mistake cutting and pasting those 1500 lines > >>> of code into my text editor (kinda hard to tell). > >>> > >>> It's 5 30 am here and I've not slept yet :-( > >>> > >>> I can't believe there's STILL no readily available > >>> external/abstraction for such a common synthesis task, I just want a > >>> "nice sounding" example that will compare with the VST's which I will > >>> be hosting from within PD; right now "ASynth" sounds about 100x better > >>> than anything made in PD itself ... > >>> > >>> Oh and I don't see any "J" example PD patches, my PD patches don't go > >>> that high. > >>> > >>> ~David > >>> > >>> On 3/14/07, Roman Haefeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> hello david > >>>> > >>>> i found examples for a bandlimited saw and bandlimited square by g. > >>>> geiger in the archives. might this is what you are looking for. > >>>> > >>>> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2006-05/038681.html > >>>> > >>>> cheers > >>>> roman > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 03:05 -0600, David Powers wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello everyone, > >>>>> > >>>>> I tried google and it was no help, and the server for the list archive > >>>>> seems to be down temporarily. > >>>>> > >>>>> Anyway, I'm giving a free (as in free beer) workshop in Chicago in > >>>>> about 16 hours, on the basics of digital synthesis. I have decided to > >>>>> use Pure Data to give my presentation, and use mostly non-commercial > >>>>> software. > >>>>> > >>>>> However, I'm still missing the following for demonstrating "proper" > >>>>> subtractive synthesis: > >>>>> 1. Good, out of the box "analog-sounding" filters. I'm using [moog~] > >>>>> right now, but I'm not all that satisfied with the sound compared to > >>>>> the filters in my favorite VST's ... > >>>>> 2. Band-limited square and sawtooth waveforms. > >>>>> > >>>>> For teaching purposes PD is great, and ideal for my demonstrations. > >>>>> But as it is, I'm having to use VST's within PD in order to > >>>>> demonstrate a "nice sounding" synth. It would be nice to show that PD > >>>>> can do it without using stuff built in Steinberg's format. That would > >>>>> also let the Mac people replicate my work, if they are interested. > >>>>> Note, nobody in the workshop has ever tried Linux, except me, so Linux > >>>>> plugins are not helpful in this case. > >>>>> > >>>>> I will post my patches after I give the workshop, though they are > >>>>> nothing fancy ... just basic: > >>>>> sequencer - oscillator - vca - filter. Good for demoing though, I'm > >>>>> starting with additive first, then subtractive. > >>>>> > >>>>> ~David > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> [email protected] mailing list > >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > >>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ___________________________________________________________ > >>>> Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: > >>>> http://mail.yahoo.de > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> [email protected] mailing list > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >>> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
