David Powers wrote: > On 3/21/07, marius schebella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am using python, but I am not an expert. I think GEM is faster for >> image operations, since it is hardwarebased or at least c code. >> and also I don't want to change my images at all, just display them >> correctly. >> the pix_info works great at the moment. I still will have a look at the >> possibilities with PIL. >> marius. > > I think (please step in Gem developers) that the hardware acceleration > only applies to 3d and not pix operations, but maybe I'm wrong. Anyway
true, but [pix_texture] is a "3d" (that is: openGL) operation and therefore hardware acceleration applies. [pix_draw] is usually NOT done in hardware (at least on non SGI machines ;-)), that is why [pix_texture]+[rectangle] is recommended. mfg.asdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
