On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:14:17 +0200 IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bosko Milakovic wrote: > > Hi! > > > > >> are there any built-in objects that behave like you are expecting [urn] > >> to behave? (apart from outputting unique random numbers, that is) > > > > I expected to be like second outlet from textfile object: on the end of > > sequence you get bang. That what I expected from urn because it was writen > > in help patch. > > obviously, if it's described in the help-patch it has to behave like > that (that is why i don't describe features in the help-patches ;-)) > > would be ok (for everybody, not just you) if the empty bang had to be > triggered separately (just like in [textfile])? > > e.g. [urn 3] > would output 3 random numbers; when banged a 4th time, it would (only) > output a bang at the right-hand side; when banging a 5th time it would > output a random number again. > > this is somewhat weird, as banging the object 40 times will only give > you 30 random numbers (but for those who don't care about the wraparound > but really want 40 numbers instead, they could just feedback the 2nd > outlet to the left inlet) > > > > it would be interesting to know whether there are objections from other > users of this object. I must say i rather like [urn] as it is. I agree that it's weird to have the bang inserted into the random number stream when it already has it's own specific outlet. Andy > > > mfa.dr > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
