hard off wrote: > IOhannes, is makesymbol going to be zapped from zexy in the future?
i don't think so (though i would love to...) > > is there any particular reason why we shouldn't use makesymbol? not really, apart from the fact that it really does not do what it claims to do. it _should_ have been a better [makefilename], and it turned out to be a worse one: while [makefilename] at least supports 2 types of formatting (%s and %d), [makesymbol] only allows one (%s). the only good thing about this object is its name.... i suggested [l2s] mainly, because you can also use it to "pack symbols" of a 3 element list, or a 12 element list (which btw, you cannot do with [makesymbol], or an N element list. fmas.dr IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
