yeah, [frame( does the trick. no problem with the spam. but next time you rather have a beer with me than playing around with gem the whole evening.... ;-)
roman On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 01:40 +0200, moritz wrote: > moritz wrote: > > hello > > > > i could not find how to give gemhead a lower rate, right now it gives 20 > > "gem_state" per second, i only need 12 per second. > > i think i can save cpu with that, or am i wrong? > > > > thanx > > > > > > moritz > > > ooups, > i just find out, that the frame argument for [gemwin] sets the speed for > [gemhead] too. > > sorry for my spam > > moritz > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
