Andy Farnell wrote: > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:21:21 +0100 > From: Andy Farnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PD] gate's problem > > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:52:04 -0400 (EDT) > "Isabel Pires" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> good morning, >> >> I have some problems with "gate". when I open saved patch the with gate's >> objet I ha the message "couldn't create" but if I rename the object it >> is create. > > rename it to [iemlib/gate] and it should always load ok
at least when you are using pd-extended (which i don't know). and only if you are really using iemlib's [gate]; there are several others which behave differently. the (imho) better solution would be to use [spigot] instead of [gate], since this is a built-in and does not require _any_ hack. iemlib's [gate]'s only feature (as compared to [spigot]) was that you could set it's initial state with arguments. since recent versions of pd, [spigot] does the same. so there are exactly 0 reasons to continue using this object. fgmasdr IOhanens _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
