Thanks for the info Derek, I have been getting mad crazy errors with ALSA and now I know to use Jack. Is ALSA really in that rough of shape?? It's always been a pain for me since I run PPC hardware which is very, very poorly supported by ALSA unfortunately (I don't think I've had a single machine with a functional line in capture under linux...)
Kevin On 4/25/07, Derek Holzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OSS (emulation) and JACK are the interfaces of choice for Linux. Miller never really worked out direct ALSA support, and continues to recommend OSS long after its obsolescence. Of the two, I've found JACK more useful. best, d. moritz wrote: > ola, > i have also to say that i have often less problems with OSS emulation on > different linux-machines then direct with ALSA. With "direct"-alsa i > have a lot of DIO-errors: > A/D/A sync bla.. DAC blocked...(even with the same audio buffer) -- derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ---Oblique Strategy # 83: "How would someone else do it?" _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- ++++ http://pocketkm.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
