On 30/04/2007, at 10.20, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Dogma Zero > ---------- > > You should only follow your own Dogmata.
Surely. But sharing ideas about what is good still is a good thing. It helps form individual ideas about it. If a majority of folks agree on a certain style then it makes a(n unofficial) standard. Thats why i bumped in. And thanks again for sharing. > Every self-respecting Dogma-collection has to be provocative (and > shouldn't be taken too serious). As above. Of cause :-) > The B&W Dogma definitely is a style question I think it all is about style (with in (this) culture). > IMO color is best used to indicate where the action is [...] Agreed. That's what i tent to do my self. > And for emphasising certain code paths, subpatches probably are > even better [...] Sometimes though im inconsistent with it, as I sometimes find it nice to have "the guts" right at hand, and at the same time have the "conventional"/obvious controls (for that given patch) highlighted. Also some help patches uses [cvn] quite clever to highlight and separate the object from the needed surroundings, which i a learning situation is better then hiding the surroundings in a subpatch. This makes this email a loop, as I'm now ready (or you/one might find it appropriate) to be refer me to Dogma Zero again. I'll exit the loop instead. Best, Steffen _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list