Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> AFAIK it does not work yet - but it should not be that hard to >> implement ... > > That does not work and would be a pain to implement.
why? > > I think that there should just be a libdir called "gemabs" for those pd > patches. If Gem was compiled as single-file-single-class, then this > would "just work". > since Gem objects do share a lot of code, even splitting Gem into a lot of separate objects (which is planned on the long term) will still need a "core" which i would implement as a (very small) Gem.pd_linux mfgasr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
