Sorry! Should read: Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the offset to 95 and the length to 30, I would like to get a loop that starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through 0 to 25, und so weiter.
apologies, d. Derek Holzer wrote: > Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the > offset to 95 and the length to 25, I would like to get a loop that > starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. > The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through 0 to > 25, und so weiter. > > best, > d. > > Frank Barknecht wrote: > >> Ah, sorry: I now read, that you don't want to start at the beginning >> of the sample but at the offset-point again. Then some more math is >> needed, I'll give it a shot a bit later. > -- derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ---Oblique Strategy # 175: "What are the sections sections of? Imagine a caterpillar moving" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
