Hallo, Matteo.sistisette hat gesagt: // Matteo.sistisette wrote: > 2) Some kind of naming scheme should be specified in order to avoid > conflicts and interferences between table/send/receive/value/etc names in > different patches. For example, you may assign an ID to each participant, > and s/he would be obliged to use his/her ID as a prefix to every name s/he > uses.
An easier solution to that problem would be to not let participants write subpatches, but an abstraction. Then the rule would be that every possible receiver (s/r, value, table, subpatches, struct, ...) must have a $0-name. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
