I went to the "latest" folder and downloaded this one: Pd-0.39.2-extended-rc2-macosx104-powerpc.dmg
The build date is 9-May-2007. Is that the one I should have used? Alain > > From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/05/09 Wed AM 11:14:37 EDT > CC: Pure Data List <[email protected]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [GEM-dev] [PD] Gem Compiling os x xcode problems > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thats cool, I think thats an elegant solution. Then I dont get why I still > > get this message from Gem: > > > > [text2d]: Gem has been compiled without FONT-support ! > > > > This is from the latest auto-build (may 9). > > which autobuild? currently there are several versions of pd-extended > built each night, probably one of them uses the old non-font Gem? > > > Well I'm still very green at this, hope you can figure it out. I will keep > > testing the nightly-builds for font > > support. This process has been my first experience with compiling > > anything. BTW i was able to get > > text support going by including the static library within the Gem build. > > Gem blew up to 4.2MB, its a > > fatty but it works for my purposes. > > well, that's the joy auf static linking (and that is one of the reasons > why on w32 and os-x most apps are so huge, while on linux most of them > are tiny) > > mfg.adr > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > GEM-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
