I tried to use the Gem from the latest pd extended autobuilds and I have also compiled my own from CVS with the same results. If you can point me in the right direction on how to get this going I would apreciate it. BTW I dont know any C or C+ but I am willing to give it a go. Thanks, Alain > > From: "chris clepper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/05/14 Mon AM 10:56:03 EDT > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PD] pix_multiblob cpu usage > > pix_multiblob is not the most efficient code but it should run at that low > resolution. Where did you get the GEM binary? It could be built without > optimization. > > On 5/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I made a 400x300 motion JPEG-a movie 15 fps with 5 solid blue circles > > moving on a black background > > to test pix_mutiblob. I open it up with pix_film, flip it with pix_flip > > and send it to pix_multiblob. I suddenly > > notices PD getting very, very slow. When I look at the cpu usage in > > activity monitor (if you can believe > > activity monitor) I get 100-104% cpu usage. I cant do anything else in PD > > because PD gets so slow. I > > am using a dual 2Ghz G5 with ATI Radeon 9800 XT and 3GB of internal > > memory. Is this normal? What > > can I do to lower cpu usage? What else can I use within Gem to get the > > same results? I eventually want > > to be able to track 20-30 objects but It looks like it would be imposible > > at this rate. > > Thanks, > > Alain > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
