Hallo, Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote: > > One solution for reproducing a sample with a signal pitch input without > > using a phasor is: > > > > (input pitch ~) > > | > > [rpole 1] > > | > > [tabread4~] > > > > (sending a [clear( to the rpole when starting playing) > > Puh, wouldn't [rpole~ 1] maybe be dangerous? Anyway I don't see any > advantage in rpole~ over phasor~.
Ah, now I see that you probably mean rpole~ as a vline~ replacement, not as one for phasor~. Yes, that would be interesting, however one needs to adjust to possibly different sample rates between the sample file and Pd, for example if you load a 44.1 kHz sample into a Pd running with 48 kHz: The speed of the ramp would need to be adjusted accordingly as rpole~ always advances with Pd's sample rate, while for playing a 44.1 sample at normal speed you need to use a ramp that advances with 44.1 kHz every sample. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
