You are right it would be. It would also be easier to make a self contained external with just one object and just use pd message system to output a list. I appreciate your help. I guess I will try to finish what I started using Martins suggestions and work on a standalone app at the same time. Is there a good reference webpage on how to integrate OSC that you can point me to? would the cpu take a buigger performance hit this way? Alain > > From: Tim Boykett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/05/29 Tue AM 11:45:08 EDT > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: <pd-list@iem.at>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PD] opencv motion tracker external HELP! > > > Hi Alain, > > wouldn't it be a lot easier to take the system that you already have and > use OSC or FIDO to send the values (that you were printing) to PD > for further processing? > > I am greatly in favour of using different systems for different jobs > and letting > a protocol like OSC or fido (netsend) connect them together. > > I could easily help you with that problem, if the code is running > already. > > Cheers, > > tim
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list