You are right it would be.  It would also be easier to make a self contained 
external with just one 
object and just use pd message system to output a list.  I appreciate your 
help. I guess I will try to 
finish what I started using Martins suggestions and work on a standalone app at 
the same time.  Is 
there a good reference webpage on how to integrate OSC that you can point me 
to? would the cpu 
take a buigger performance hit this way?
Alain
> 
> From: Tim Boykett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/05/29 Tue AM 11:45:08 EDT
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: <pd-list@iem.at>, 
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PD] opencv motion tracker external HELP!
> 
> 
> Hi Alain,
> 
> wouldn't it be a lot easier to take the system that you already have and
> use OSC or FIDO to send the values (that you were printing) to PD
> for further processing?
> 
> I am greatly in favour of using different systems for different jobs  
> and letting
> a protocol like OSC or fido (netsend) connect them together.
> 
> I could easily help you with that problem, if the code is running  
> already.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> tim



_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to