IO, I understand what you where saying. I just figured it would be easier to make a self contained external than to try to figure out how to convert things so that Gems GL stuff could use it. From what you are saying I was probably wrong. I just could not figure it out really and there was no how to for Gem like the how to you wrote for Pd (althogh the Gem sorce is documented well).
Nanodust, When I said "have you used pix_multiblob before" I was not trying to be inflamatory I was just asking. >From your reply I think it might have come out that way but it was not ment >that way. I appreciate all input. Thanks to all, Alain > > From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/05/30 Wed AM 09:57:55 EDT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PD] Opencv & pd > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I dont know if you have ever used pix_multiblob before. This would be my > > first option and I already > > just to make sure that we do not misunderstand each other: > i had no intention in saying that you should stick to the existing objects. > i thought that you should integrate your openCV objects into Gem and not > brew your own objects. > > the problems you described (sending pointers to and fro), show that you > do not create Gem objects (which would handle this stuff for you). > > > mfg.asdr > IOhannes > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
