Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Niklas Klügel wrote:
about the issues of explicitely threading parts of the graph (that
came up in the discussion lateron), i must say i don't get why you
would want to do it.
Because it's cheaper to implement.
If well done, it's also an intermediate step towards automatic
threading. It's important to cut hard goals into easier goals, because
it reduces required investment and gives quicker returns.
yes, I totally agree but I was curious about the technical aspects and
not necessarily about the development process that naturally has to
obey these rules.
Also, I wouldn't trust automatic threading to make use of the CPUs in
the best possible way all of the time, *especially* for real-time.
well, afair an algorithm for the optimal solution would be in NP anyway.
if a suboptimal solution is enough, i think you can use it in a realtime
system very well; ableton live for example scales with multiple cores/cpus.
so long...
Niklas
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
