>>> On a side note, I wonder if hardware manufacturers will ever start >>> implementing OSC in their instruments? >>> >> >> as someone who has worked a little with embedded programming: i >> doubt it. >> when you've only got 16k of flash memory in which to fit >> *everything*, and >> 700 bytes of RAM, it's hard to justify doing string comparisons. >> >> > I'm using these things: > http://www.rabbitsemiconductor.com/products/rcm3700/ > , which are embedded controllers with 512k of flash and another > 512k of > RAM. I have implemented OSC communications over UDP with them, to > switch relays and read sensors.
as far as OSC sensor interfaces goes there's also some listed here: http://www.sensorwiki.org/index.php/Sensor_interfaces but I guess that's not the hardware manufactures ggp was talking about for custom designs it can make sense though > I'm also interested in this qwerk thingie: > http://www.charmedlabs.com/index.php? > option=com_content&task=view&id=29 thanks for the link finally an ARM board with an FPU (even an FPGA on there - could port the gluion onto this baby...) > , it should be able to run pd and csound and interface to some high > quality audio card, controlled by OSC, all inside a cardboard box with > tinfoil veneer ;) > > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
