On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 21:42 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> netpd has been changing a lot over the last years, and things that
> change a lot don't work well in Pd-extended. You get version
> troubles, etc.
maybe i am blind to see the obvious solution, but the main problem i see
in including netpd into pd-extended is a complete different one: at
least the patches and the abstraction folders need to be outside the
package, since a user needs to have a writing access to these while
using netpd. if netpd would be included into pd-extended, either one
has to create the necessary folders him/herself, or pd-extended would
create them in <whereever> (assumingly /home/user/netpd,
resp. /User/npetd), which is ugly and very unconvenient, if someone
doesn't have any plans to use netpd at all.
> I'd really like to see a lot of the netpd code made
> into reusable objects and gathered into libs.
yep. i also think this is a good idea.
roman
___________________________________________________________
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
