Roman Haefeli a écrit : > the aim of netpd is to provide a framework, in which selfwritten code > can be used. i think this selfwritten code should stay in the authority > of the author and not be moved to some 'superior' authority. something > that we all want, are patches, that just work and are portable. i > believe that this could rather reached by letting the principles of > darwin rule (patches that don't work out of the box or are too > complicated won't be used and so not distributed), rather than one > needing to play god in order to keep the world running. > The word 'Authority' has a downside effect I didn't even expected, because it has an explicit sociological connotation linked to 'superior authority' that doesn't even make sense into the context of gnu softwares. By the way of authority, I mean coordinator(s) that has access to net-pd archives, cvs, or anything, and would communicate with patch authors about things that work, and other things that don't work. Maybe it's too much demanding, especially if there are not a lot of people that has access to the dev/distribution of the main net-pd patches. pk
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
