On 19/06/2007, at 18.48, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> i forgot to mention, my and syntax' abstractions use a version tag of > the format: > > [version x.x.x( (where x can be any integer number) > > this is used in netpd, though i am not sure if it makes sense to > have it > as a standard. if you think, that it makes sense to have a version tag > at all, it'd be cool, if we could define it that way to define a > version. Version numbers i think is crucial. It is simply a dread when folks share there nice code and one don't have a simple system (version numbers) to keep track of what is what and what is newer. By all means, please! The "x.x.x"-system might be nice. How do you use it? Keep the first x=0 at all times as no code gets to version 1; bumb the second x when new features are added; bumb the last x when bugs are corrected? - Such info one how the version numbers makes sense is nice to add in a README, i think. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
