On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:07:11PM -0300, Carlos Pita wrote: > 1) reassemble the code from atoms.
This one excites me the most because it's so lightweight and Pd-like. It's would probably be easy to build on Larry's work that Frank posted, integrating SIOD and make it reconsistute the atoms to pass to SIOD for compilation. > 2) provide a object with a gui specialized for code edition. > > I think 2, although a bit laborious, fit best to the goal of code edition. > We could treat code as a single string, instead of dealing with symbols, and > we could even (this is wishful thinking) provide some syntax highlighting > and formatting. I'm pretty new to pd but I guess I could take g_bang.c and > friends as examples to start working with. If you are going to go this way, why not make a generic code editing object that can be used for the other embedded languages too? That way you could use the one external for Python, Ruby, Scheme, C or whatever takes your fancy. Best, Chris. ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
