On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:29:40PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Anyway, seriously, if you wanted [unpost] as an external
for Miller's pd, you can't, because Miller rejected the
sys_printhook patch in 2004.
Maybe it would go in now that there is this excellent
concrete example of being able to catch and process errors in-patch.
If it makes sense to you that excellent concrete examples can push
new features into pd, I cannot help your case. It doesn't work that way.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
