> I totally agree, this is a good outline of how it should work for all > objects. If it loads and then doesn't do anything, at least you can > open the help patch.
Exactly. > Before putting too much effort into the messy dumpOSC/sendOSC, you > should check out Martin Peach's OSC and network objects. I haven't really used them yet, but since they are more actively developed, I suppose a decision should be made at some point about whether to leave dumpOSC/sendOSC in Pd? Since the mrpeach objects don't include both network and OSC stuff in the same object, perhaps replacement objects could be created using his routines, a simple mash-up of the peach udpsend/receive and his packOSC routines. Perhaps it could even be done as an abstraction. Would there be any point doing that? Mainly I just think it would be simpler if we standardized on a single OSC implementation.. But then again it would be some work just to replace objects that we already have. Steve _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
