Hallo, Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote: > You create a "points" instance with [append] as well. The problem is, > that [append] needs to set one field of the struct, when creating an > instance through an incoming message. But you cannot set an array with > a message directly
Oh, I just found out, that you *can* indeed do this and create an array directly, as in attached patch. Pd warns "error: pd-points.array1: not a number", it ignores the value of that number, but still creates the array. For clarity I would still recommend to do as below: > so you should extend your struct definition by at > least one float variable. The implicit variables "x" or "y" come to > mind. > > So the solution is: you use [struct points float x array array1 point] > instead of your defintion, and then append with [append points x]. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
append-array.pd
Description: application/puredata
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
