Hallo, Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote: > If you would like a bang message when [1 300(-[line~] is complete then you > merely > have to say > > [bang( > | > [t b b] > | | > [del 300] [1 300( > | | > [outlet done] [line~] > | > [outlet line] > > Even though the evaluation goes right-left and depth first the bang appearing > at [outlet done] happens at the **exact** logical time that [line~] is > complete.
As Roman noted it is not exactly exact if you're starting your [line~] and [delay] from a clock-delayed message, because then [delay] will still keep logical time, while [line~] is quantized to 64 samples. But in practice this generally isn't an issue: If such accuracy is required in an application (e.g. granular synthesis), nobody would (or should) use [line~] anyway, [vline~] is the line to go for here. If one *really* wants get back the inaccurate block-quantized delays one's used to from Max, attached patch illustrates a possible approach using [bang~]. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
un-clock.pd
Description: application/puredata
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
