Hallo, Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote: > But this is better :) If the limiter is on the output then the counter > continues > beyond the 0-127 range and goes out of bounds. Putting [clip] (same as min and > max together) inside the counter locks the value in range. > > What's the best solution to prevent overshoot? I did solve this once before > but it used spigots and was ugly imo.
It's possible even simpler: Instead of a classical counter you can use an accumulator, which is a similar idiom, but has [f ] and [+ ] reversed: [+ ]x[f ]. Then you send the step size instead of a bang into the [+]. The restrict it with [clip] as you would restrict a normal counter with [mod]. It's attached. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
left-right.pd
Description: application/puredata
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
