On 8/3/07, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just curious, why wouldn't there ever be a 64-bit version of GEM? >
Apple reversed a previous decision and killed the 64 bit Carbon C/C++ API. I've been thinking that a 64-bit build of Pd-extended would be nice to have, > especially because using 64-bit floats as Pd's native format would make it > much more flexible. You could represent UNIX timestamps properly, for > example. > 64 bit double precision floating point has been available for ages and has nothing to do with 64 bit addressing.
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
