On Aug 11, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Charles Henry wrote: > That might not be necessary. The delayed 'stop' message only comes > after the most recent message. If multiple messages are sent within > the delay time, then only the last one matters. > > So, I think, the worst that could happen ( in a series of bang/stop > messages) is a redundant stop message, which I assume does nothing. >
Thanks. I was easily able to create a patch that confirms that behavior. ___________________ (---o-------o-o-o---o-o-o----( David F. Place mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
