Hallo, Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > What about patches that use # or ? or @ to mean something else > already? > > By treating all character combinations to be valid unless otherwise > used, Pd has painted itself in a corner about extending > functionality. Anything new breaks some compatibility: you can only > hope that a certain combination of characters is not already in use > by actual patches, but you can't even know that.
True. That's why I think, adding new meanings should only be considered for things more urgent. While the slightly different meaning of $ in message and object context is a bit confusing at first, it's something that one can get used to quite easily. OTOH I'm really glad that dollar substitution inside of a symbol instead of only at the start is possible now, even if that did break some older patches. This feature is just too convenient to pass by. CIao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
