Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, marius schebella wrote: >> Frank Barknecht wrote: >>> reason. But as Marius' and others' suggestion of changing $ in >>> messages to # >> no, I was talking about changing the sign for creation arguments! >> for reasons of backwards compatibitily. > > For reasons of backwards compatibility you'd keep $- the same because if > you write $- it currently stays $- ... if you are going to selectively > drop compatibility, you ought to explain why and how, e.g. "because $- > is rarer than #" ...
in old patches you have $1 $2 $3 in messages and $0 $1 $2 in objects presumtion: you don't just simply want to add $0-feature to messages simply because it would be inconsequent, or difficult to understand for newbies... therefor you want to differentiate between creation and message arguments. giving one of them a new appearance, but still making old patches work. case 1 (bad): you have $0 $1 #1 $2 #2 $3 #3 in messages and $0 $1 $2 $3 in objects. (that's bad because, then u still have the confusion of $0 and $- in messages, exactly what you did not want case 2 (better): you have #0 #1 #2 #3 #4 $1 $2 $3 $4 in messages (all meaning different things) and $0 or #0, $1 or #1, $2 or #2 in objects. (#- the new style, but for backwards compatibilty still allowing the old $- style) hope this is clear enough. marius. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
