Quoting Robert Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At the same time can we also get rid of the 'only $s at the beginning of a > string get interpreted' rule? >
as frank has said, at the same time we could make sure that we are running an actual version of Pd (or try, whether the requested feature is already implemented...) :-) > Nesting abstractions within abstractions just to get that is sometimes not an > option. it would be interesting how you acchieve the required functionility with nested abstractions. i cannot think how you do that... mfg.adsr. IOhannes ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
